Well, the time has come for me to update my digital camera. Coming from 35 mm classical film, all manual settings camera and a Canon G6, the only way I’m going is to buy a DSLR.
While this may seem as a straight forward solution to the fact that I’ve finally reached the capabilities of my trusted Canon G6, there are a lot of factors to consider: my style of photography, the subjects, future needs and most importantly COST.
With limited financial resources, I need to find the best DSLR + lenses that will cover all my needs for at least 1 – 2 years from now on. I also need a system that will allow me to shoot landscapes, nature, macro photos and portraits in studio.
My Canon G6 main specifications look like this:
Body:
- Max resolution: 3072 x 2304 pixels
- ISO rating: 50, 100, 200, 400
- Auto focus type: TTL, 9-point, FlexiZone
- Min shutter: 15 sec
- Max shutter: 1/2000 sec
- Storage types: Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Lens
- Aperture range: F2.0 – F3.0 / F8
- Zoom wide (W): 35 mm equivalent
- Zoom tele (T): 140 mm equivalent
- Normal focus range: 50 cm
- Macro focus range: wide 5 cm / tele 15 cm
Taking this camera to its limits in the field and also in a small studio, I’ve discovered that I really need:
Body:
- Max resolution: at least 10 megapixels (12 megapixels would be ideally)
- ISO rating: 100, 200, 400
- Auto focus (fast, but not very fast, I “shoot” mostly static subjects)
- Min shutter: 15 sec (more would be better)
- Max shutter: 1/2000 sec
Lens(es):
- Wide: at least 28 mm equivalent (I really need it for buildings and landscapes)
- Normal + portrait: 50 – 80 mm equivalent, as good as can be
- Macro: 100-150 mm equivalent, the best possible for small objects (like fruits, vegetables, etc)
After 2 months of reading all possible camera and lenses reviews, here are my conclusions, hopefully you’ll find them useful if you’re looking for the best digital system that your limited financial resources can buy:
1. ALWAYS start with the lenses, the DSLR is as good as the lenses you put on it.
2. ANY DSLR is far better in terms of its capabilities than you can use (as a beginner, of course), YOU are the one who is supposed to take those capabilities to their limits.
3. Except for differences in style of photography, DO NOT choose your camera based on a brand preference (I obviously prefer CANON, but I’ve found quite a few reasons that would make me buy a Nikon).
With cost in mind, I’ve limited my “preferences” to two cameras: Nikon D80 and Canon 400D (Rebel XTI) – I think that both cameras would be more than enough for what I want to do with them, it does not matter witch one I buy, is just the matter of lenses that will make the difference.
The thing that I like about these cameras: Canon’s 400D low noise throughout the sensitivity range and EOS Integrated Cleaning System versus Nikon’s D80 bright viewfinder and support for SD and SDHC cards.
The rest of the options, settings, etc. are more or less the same, with 10 megapixels each, a cropped field of view for lenses of 1.6 for Canon 400D and 1.5 for Nikon D80, with the mention that there are a few settings on the Nikon (like customizable automatic sensitivity – ISO) that would make it a better candidate.
The really important factor in deciding what camera to buy is the COST OF THE LENSES:
If I buy the CANON, here are my options:
1.Going really cheap:
a. Landscape, architecture, portrait – kit lens – Canon EF- S 18-55 mm (28 – 90 mm equivalent) F/3.5-F5.6 to F/22
b.Portrait, nature, macro – Tamron AF 55-200mm (90 – 320 mm equivalent) F/4-5.6 Di II LD Macro
Total price = 886 USD
Canon Digital Rebel XTi SLR with EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 Zoom Lens = 707 USD
Tamron 55 – 200mm F/4.0-5.6 DI-II LD Macro = 179 USD
2. Going for far better lenses:
a. Landscape, architecture, portrait – Canon EF-S 17-55mm (27 – 90 mm equivalent) F/2.8 IS USM
b. Portrait, nature – Canon EF 70-300mm (112 – 480mm equivalent) F/4-5.6 IS USM
c. Specialized macro lens – Tokina AF 100mm (160 mm equivalent) F/2.8 Macro 1:1 AT-XM100 Pro D
Total price = 2560 USD
Canon Digital Rebel XTi SLR = 620 USD
Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM = 1000 USD
Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM = 540 USD
Tokina AF 100mm F/2.8 Macro 1:1 AT-XM100 Pro D = 400 USD
3. A compromise:
a. Landscape, architecture, portrait – Canon EF-S 17-55mm (27 – 90 mm equivalent) F/2.8 IS USM
b. Nature, macro – Tamron 70-300mm (112 – 480mm equivalent) F/4-F5.6 Di LD 1:2 Macro
Total price = 1790 USD
Canon Digital Rebel XTi SLR = 620 USD
Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM = 1000 USD
Tamron 70-300mm F/4-F5.6 Di LD 1:2 Macro = 170 USD
If I buy the NIKON, here are my options:
1. Going for a kit + macro:
a. Landscape, architecture, portrait, nature – kit lens – Nikon 18 – 135mm (27 – 202mm equivalent) F/3.5-F5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX
b. Nature, macro – Tamron 70-300mm (105 – 450mm equivalent) F/4-F5.6 Di LD 1:2 Macro
Total price = 1320 USD
Nikon D80 Digital SLR Camera with 18-135 F/3.5-F5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX = 1150 USD
Tamron 70-300mm (105 – 450mm equivalent) F/4-F5.6 Di LD 1:2 Macro = 170 USD
2. A better deal (despite of the higher price):
a. Nikon 18mm – 200mm (27 – 300mm equivalent) F/3.5-F5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR with macro capabilities
Total price = 1600 USD
Nikon D80 Digital SLR Camera Body = 850 USD
Nikon 18mm – 200mm F/3.5-F5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR = 750 USD
As a conclusion, I need to decide what configuration suits my needs better:
CANON
Total price = 1790 USD
Canon Digital Rebel XTi SLR = 620 USD
Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM = 1000 USD
Tamron 70-300mm F/4-F5.6 Di LD 1:2 Macro = 170 USD
NIKON
Total price = 1600 USD
Nikon D80 Digital SLR Camera Body = 850 USD
Nikon 18mm – 200mm F/3.5-F5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR = 750 USD
CANON system advantages:
- Zoom range 28 – 480mm equivalent
- Superb image quality from the Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 lens
- Better macro
- EOS Integrated Cleaning System
- Low noise throughout the sensitivity range
CANON system disadvantages:
- No image stabilization for the Tamron lens
- Slightly higher price
NIKON system advantages:
- A single lens – great versatility
- Zoom range 28 – 300mm equivalent – Vibration Reduction throughout the zoom range
- Minimum focus range: 0.5m (1.6 ft.)
- Great “user experience”
NIKON system disadvantages:
- Barrel distortion at 17mm
- Zoom range to 300mm (compared to 480mm)
So, considering the image quality, the EOS Integrated Cleaning System and the 400D low noise throughout the sensitivity range, I’m going for the CANON system.
Disclaimer:
Conclusion / recommendation / ratings are based on the opinions of the author, which are provided for use “as is” and without warranty of any kind, Canon, Nikon, Tamron, Tokina are trademarks belonging to their respective owners.
Can’t wait to win the new DSLR this company is offering now! lol > http://www.plaquefreenation.com/
Perfect. I love the way you did ur research and compared each fairly. Money was also an issue for me and wanted a beginner dlsr to learn and have fun with. Ebay was very, very good. Thanks for the tip on purchasing my first lens.